When Productized Services Are Better for Buyers
Learn the key differences between productized services and time-and-materials (T&M) services for software implementation. Discover how productized services offer predictability, lower risk, and reflect provider expertise, while T&M offers flexibility but with higher risk.

Productized Services vs. Time-and-Materials Services: Managing Risk for Software Buyers
When software buyers seek implementation services, one of the biggest concerns is managing risk—particularly around project costs, timelines, and deliverables. Two popular service models, productized services and time-and-materials (T&M) services, tackle this risk in very different ways. Understanding how each model works—and the trade-offs involved—will help you choose the option that best aligns with your goals, budget, and project requirements.
Productized Services: Predictability, Low Risk—and a Sign of Expertise
Productized services offer a fixed cost, a defined timeline, and a predetermined scope. Beyond providing predictability, a productized approach often signals a high level of expertise: providers who can confidently set firm prices and delivery dates typically have extensive experience delivering similar projects.
Cost Assurance
With productized services, the price tag is transparent and fixed from the outset. This makes budgeting simple and eliminates “surprise” invoices during or after the engagement. Providers who have performed the same type of service many times can accurately forecast how long each phase will take—leading to fewer surprises and more dependable pricing.
Defined Scope & Timelines
Because of their experience, productized-service providers can clearly define the project’s scope and timelines up front. This helps curb scope creep: any additions or changes usually require a formal change order, so you won’t be caught off-guard by extra charges.
Efficiency and Accountability
Locking in scope, cost, and deadlines motivates both the buyer and the provider to stay on track. Providers who miss deadlines risk eating into their own margins, while buyers enjoy a streamlined, predictable process. This built-in accountability often drives faster, more efficient project completions.
Lower Financial Risk
Since the cost is fixed, buyers avoid the burden of cost overruns. If unforeseen complexities arise, the provider typically bears the additional expense. For companies seeking budget certainty, this shift of financial risk can make productized services particularly appealing.
The Mark of a True Expert
Perhaps the biggest advantage of productized services is that they highlight the expertise of the vendor. Providers who have seen and solved recurring problems in their niche can confidently offer guaranteed pricing and firm deadlines.
Time-and-Materials Services: Flexibility with Higher Risk
Time-and-materials (T&M) services charge buyers for the actual hours (and resources) invested in a project. While this structure offers flexibility, it also brings certain downsides—including budgetary unpredictability, increased administrative effort, and greater vulnerability to cost overruns.
Slow Scoping and Contracting
Because T&M contracts are based on detailed task-by-task estimates, the scoping phase can be lengthy. Service providers often feel the need to document every small task to estimate total hours accurately—since labor, not materials, usually drives the cost.
Uncertain Costs
Even with thorough scoping, T&M’s final price tag remains uncertain. As the project unfolds, new complexities or features may surface, driving up hours and costs. Buyers typically must keep a close eye on progress and maintain a contingency budget for potential overruns.
Scope Creep and Project Delays
Without a fixed scope, scope creep can easily occur. Minor tasks and seemingly small changes add up over time, extending the timeline well beyond the original estimate.
Provider Leverage and “Surprise” Invoices
A common pitfall in T&M projects occurs when a service provider discovers (or claims to discover) an unforeseen issue. They may then require additional funds and more time to finish.
Choosing the Right Model
Your decision between productized and time-and-materials services depends on your risk tolerance, budget constraints, and the nature of your project.
- Choose Productized Services if you value predictable costs, firm deadlines, and a clearly defined scope.
- Opt for T&M Services if project flexibility is paramount, and you anticipate changes along the way.
Ready to Reduce Implementation Risk?
At Figfy, we help software companies connect their customers with trusted solutions partners who deliver predictable, high-quality implementation services.
Want to see how Figfy can help your customers get the services they need—on time and on budget? Get your free demo!